Back in time, no organization or employee could even imagine working remotely or working from home as this seemed nearly impossible then. But as it is said, nothing lasts and does this. The advent of the covid-19 pandemic introduced the world to the new reality of the corporate world which is working remotely.
It is the remote working that kept the companies and employees surviving even in those days when the bare survival was at stake. Luckily, there are some effective ways to manage the remote teams to make things easier for the employees. But as soon as the pandemic slowed down and the lockdown lifted, some of the companies started calling their employees back to work from the office as previously.
Be it, In-house working and working remotely, both are good. But there originated several myths concerning remote vs in-house working. Consequently, if you are also confused about what to opt for your organization, then you have come to the right place.
This blog post is centered around the common myths of in-house vs remote working and other things about the same.
Parameters of In-House vs Remote Working
Some companies are in favor of remote working whereas others prefer work from the office. Consequently, many are in a dilemma over what is best and what is not. But no worries as going through the parameters discussed below will clear out the confusion.
Let’s have an insight into some of the parameters of in-house vs remote working in the sections mentioned below.
Time
The first crucial parameter is Time. when it comes to the ones working remotely, then such workers are built together by the duration of the project or its deadline. It is always a better idea to decide the duration of the project beforehand so that you can be sure of its discipline, planning, and delivery guidelines.
But when the work happens in-house, then there will already be professionals to look after the project and also deliver on time. The in-house professionals don’t require any supervision and can work independently.
Costs
Another great parameter when it comes to remote vs in-house working costs. There is a great difference in the costs of remote and in-house employees. The average earning per hour of a remote developer is around $41-$160.
But when you hire the in-house developer or professional of some other domain, there are numerous other expenses apart from the salary which includes bonuses, incentives, training, rentals, and technology.
In addition to this, if you happen to hire the candidate from some hiring agencies, then the cost is further going to exceed. Consequently, there is a great variation in cost when it comes to remote vs in-house.
Professionals
Every organization makes sure to hire professionals for the job when you are hiring for the in-house team. No matter what your needs are, you always need to have professionals in your department.
But when it comes to hiring for the remote position, you just need to convey your requirements to an agency and then the agency will provide you with the quality personnel. A recent survey conducted on remote vs in-house revealed that 45% of employers can’t find the workers with the desired skills.
In addition to this, around 54% of employees require additional training to do full justice to the job and bring the organization the desired results.
Absence
Whether your employees are working in-house or remotely, understanding that your employees need to take off is crucial. The employees can take off due to their illness, traffic, infrastructure constraints, or personal emergencies.
But this is not all. Apart from the reasons mentioned above, sometimes, employees also leave because they get better prospects somewhere else. Usually, an average employee only stays with a particular organization between 1.5-3 years but not more than that.
Thankfully, this is not the case when you have a remote team. The remote employees have a fixed time slot. Moreover, the vacant positions are not your concern.
Talent
The next crucial parameter comes out to be talent. One has to depend on the talent pool which is available at your location at that time when you are hiring in-house. It might keep you deprived of some of the best resources you might have otherwise.
Fortunately, remote work does not have this scenario. No matter wherever you are, you’ll always have the best resources for work and global experts who are skilled and proficient in their domains.
Scalability
The organizations only have the required number of candidates for the job which would be sufficient for them when hiring in-house. Hiring more than required will mean unnecessary expenses of salary and other things in the company.
But if at any time, the job grows in importance, then again the circle of hiring repeats as you need to move fast to complete your project. Fortunately, remote working does not face any such issues.
In remote working, the organizations always hire more than their requirement so that the working process becomes seamless.
Myths for Building Remote Teams
Less productive
The most common myth hovering around the employees working remotely is that they are not as productive as those who work in an office. But in reality, this is not the case. Productivity has nothing to do with in-office or remote working. It only sees whether the person is the best fit for the particular job or not.
In reality, remote workers are said to be more productive than the ones working from the office. Consequently, this is only a myth and is far away from reality.
Suitable for a few jobs
Another popular myth heard regarding remote jobs is that it is suitable only for particular job types. Some people consider remote work to be the best option only for those who are tech-savvy or handle client interactions.
But this is not true. Due to the improvement in technology and technology being present in every one or the other sphere, it has become easy for several individuals to work remotely. The availability of widespread tools has further made it easy.
No supervision possible
The people out there also believe that remote work means no supervision or the manager won’t be able to supervise. Effective supervision is not the only one in which the manager interacts in person with the employees.
But this is far from reality. Working remotely can make supervision easy for the manager. The manager simply has to set appropriate goals and benchmarks based on which he will evaluate the performance of the employees and supervise it.
Wrapping Up
Now that you know the parameters of choosing between the in-house and remote employees, you can decide which one will turn out to be best for your organization. While deciding this, do bear in mind your projects in the pipeline and take your proper time to decide. Choose a befitting system for both your organization and your employees.